--- description: Discover the benefits and disadvantages of Responsive. Learn the software price, see the description, and read the most helpful reviews for UK business users. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Responsive Pricing, Cost & Reviews - Capterra UK 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Proposal Management Software](/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) > [Responsive](/software/148054/Responsive) # Responsive Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/148054/Responsive Page: 1 / 8\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/148054/Responsive?page=2) > Responsive’s (formerly RFPIO) AI-driven Strategic Response Management platform drives more deals won with smarter, faster responses. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 177 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Who Uses Responsive? Leading response teams — proposal, sales, presales, marketing, customer support, IT, security, compliance and more — trust Responsive to automate their RFP, RFI, DDQ and other RFX processes. ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 177 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: Responsive (formerly RFPIO) - **Location**: Beaverton, US - **Founded**: 2015 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: Usage Based - **Target Audience**: 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: Chinese, Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Spanish, Swedish, Traditional Chinese - **Available Countries**: Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, India, Israel, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sweden and 3 more ## Features - Access Controls/Permissions - Audit Trail - Automatic Formatting - Collaboration Tools - Content Library - Content Management - Data Import/Export - Document Management - Due Date Tracking - Full Text Search - Knowledge Base Management - Knowledge Library - Milestone Tracking - Progress Tracking - Project Planning/Scheduling - Proposal Generation - RFP Management - Reporting & Statistics - Reporting/Analytics - Reporting/Project Tracking - Search/Filter - Task Management - Templates - Third-Party Integrations - Time & Expense Tracking - Vendor Management - Version Control - Workflow Management ## Integrations (26 total) - Box - Cisco Duo - Dropbox Business - Google Chat - Google Drive - Highspot - HubSpot CRM - Jira - Microsoft Azure - Microsoft Excel - Microsoft Outlook - Microsoft PowerPoint - Microsoft SharePoint - Microsoft Teams - Microsoft Word ... and 11 more integrations ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) - Chat ## Category - [Proposal Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.uk/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) ## Related Categories - [Proposal Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.uk/directory/10032/proposal-management/software) - [Project Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.uk/directory/30002/project-management/software) - [RFP Software](https://www.capterra.co.uk/directory/31555/rfp/software) - [Business Process Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.uk/directory/30010/business-process-management/software) - [Knowledge Management Software](https://www.capterra.co.uk/directory/30094/knowledge-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Breeze](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/1073046/Breeze) — 5.0/5 (15 reviews) 2. [XaitPorter](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/76385/xaitporter) — 4.7/5 (46 reviews) 3. [Axonaut](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/178036/axonaut) — 4.6/5 (22 reviews) 4. [VT Docs](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/117155/visiblethread-docs) — 4.9/5 (51 reviews) 5. [PandaDoc](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/131735/pandadoc) — 4.5/5 (1243 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Good product, could do with more customisation" — 4.0/5 > **Matthew** | *17 December 2024* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: I like how it acts as as repository for our Q\&As and can also help with projects. > > **Cons**: I don't like the lack of functionality around custom fields. For my company it is really important the AI doesn't give wrong info based on wrong product version.\` > > Overall quite good. took a while to get use to and learn most of the functionalities, but it is a very effective tool. ----- ### "A Practical, Time‑Saving Tool for Modern RFP Teams" — 5.0/5 > **Johanny** | *16 April 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: What I liked most about Responsive was how intuitive and practical it was for real RFP work. The content library made it easy to reuse curated, trusted answers, collaboration was smooth across teams, and the automation genuinely saved time without taking control away. Overall, it reduced friction and made the process feel much more manageable. > > **Cons**: The platform could feel a bit heavy at times. Search and answer suggestions sometimes required a lot of tuning, and if the content wasn’t well‑maintained, the library could get cluttered quickly. Reporting and admin tasks also felt more complex than they needed to be, especially for day‑to‑day use. > > Overall, my experience with Responsive was positive. It made RFP responses more organized, collaborative, and efficient, especially when it came to reusing content and keeping teams aligned. While it required some upkeep to get the most value out of it, it ultimately helped reduce manual effort and made the process feel more controlled and scalable. ----- ### "Nobody wants to answer RFPs, Responsive makes it easier" — 4.0/5 > **Hector** | *27 March 2026* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: No one wants to answer RFPs; it is an outdated industry practice. Responsive makes this easier by providing a central repository for all RFP responses and enabling collaboration among team members, which improves productivity by allowing people from different teams to work on proposals in parallel. > > **Cons**: The AI capabilities are still immature, and the generated answers always need to be reviewed, which is time-consuming and undermines the solution's productivity gains. > > I think the solution has many areas for improvement, particularly in AI and library maintenance, but the core functionality is solid and delivers the key features needed by growing organizations. ----- ### "Improving Ease of Use" — 4.0/5 > **Christian** | *24 March 2026* | Hospital & Health Care | Recommendation rating: 8.0/10 > > **Pros**: The content library is the most valuable mechanism. It has profoundly improved our RFP answering process and allows us to submit at least two times as many RFPs. > > **Cons**: Ease of use could use improvements. I want more hot key customizability to move around the software with fewer clicks and more using keys instead of mouse. Also more of the features should be able to be right clicked and opened in a new window. Also the ribbon in the commenting area should be slidable so that different tabs are next to each other. For example, I want comments, activity, recommendations next to each other as my most used but it's annoying when they are far apart and require multiple clicks to go back and forth between them. > > Overall my experience is great. Made this RFP experience better than any in my past but it still needs a lot of work on ease of use features. ----- ### "Responsive Review" — 3.0/5 > **Hannah** | *24 March 2026* | Pharmaceuticals | Recommendation rating: 5.0/10 > > **Pros**: It automates responses, and aids in seeing past responses. Helps track the progress of bids and sets reminders to meet deadlines. > > **Cons**: The answers don't always pull in accurately for questions we have seen over and over again. Navigating questions can be difficult, or going back to finding an unanswered question is not straightforward. > > Ok. Has some features that simplifies the RFP process, while other navigation features make it harder. ----- Page: 1 / 8\ Next: [Next page](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/148054/Responsive?page=2) ## Links - [View on Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.uk/software/148054/Responsive) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Structured Data